Saturday, July 13, 2019

Sony 200-600mm G Lens vs 100-400 GM + 1.4x

I ran a simple test today with the above mentioned combo today. I tried as best I could under the time I had to match up magnification, hence why the 200-600 might not be at rounded off focal lengths. I wanted to tripod a test @100 iso as Ive only seen high ISO tests. And I wanted a relatively flat scene. Finally, I shot wide open and stopped down a bit without going deep diffraction, I want to know usability for me.
Its by no means thorough but as Im 2 days post surgery its all I had the energy for today. My 100-400mm I have enjoyed as the better of the recent samples I have tested. The 1.4x is not mine so I dont have any long term views on it. I only have 1 x 200-600mm at the moment so there may be some sample variation with them as they ship next week.
So here you go... I hope it helps.. For me... Im sticking with the 100-400mm GM for now.  

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Hands On with Sony 12-24mm g & 16-35mm 2.8 GM Lenses

I had a chance today to have a very brief hands on with the newly announced Sony lenses for the Sony FE mount system.

My main interest on a personal level is with the 16-35mm 2.8 and to see if it will replace me adapted Canon 16-35mm F4 lens. I have an exceptional copy of the Canon lens and after testing multiple copies of the Sony Zeiss 16-35mm F4 lens I decided to stick with the Canon for my wide range.

There are a few raws kicking round the internet with the A9 and the 2 mentioned lenses. I really wanted to see how they would stand up with my 42 meg A7r Mark II. It was a very quick meeting with the Sony boys so quickly took a couple of shots outside of work. The intention was to get some elements around the frame, especially near the edges and corners. Also to have sufficient shutter speed and mid range aperture to eliminate any obvious issues.

I will get to test more thoroughly when they both ship. I also got to test the new 100-400mm which I will follow up on soon.

My initial thoughts are very positive. Especially with the 16-35mm... Linked are a couple of raws of the random scene...

Sony FE 12-24mm G
Sony FE 16-35mm 2.8 GM
Sony FE 16-35mm 2.8 GM

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

'Follow Me' on Instagram

Ive been playing around with Instagram of late and Im really enjoying the community on Instagram and the ability to test images and simply add some fun and unique images that wouldn't necessarily make it on to my website. If your on Instagram, give me a click.... and if you like what you see 'follow me'. 😀

Ill be putting new material on there regularly➡    http:www.instagram/promimagenz

Friday, January 29, 2016

Carl Zeiss Loxia 21mm vs ZE Distagon 21mm

Ive finally got my hands on one of the new Loxia 21mm lenses. The ZE 21mm has been one of my most used and loved lenses for my Canon system and I was intrigued to see how this new smaller 21mm would perform on my A7RII.

The Loxia is really beautiful in the flesh. Very small in comparison and quite clearly very well made. The weight difference from my ZE with adaptor vs the new Loxia is 936 gms vs 389 gms. Quite a significant advantage! Over half a kilo in metric money.

The way I have always used the ZE is to pre focus at infinity and then back off just a touch. This give the best DOF as well as keeping the corners at near to there best. If you focus a third in etc or hyper focus you will find the lens curvature will leave your corners wanting. Focusing the way I do will give you great depth at around F11 with little in the way of diffraction and very very good corners.

Ok so after lots of tests to see if the new lens performs in much the same way the answer is, yes. In fact you can focus on infinity hard stop and F11 will give you even greater depth toward you then the ZE does. Sharpness wise, well I kept choosing one, then the next shot the other..... So its as close as close can be. They both have that lovely 3D look that the Zeiss's micro contrast brings.

Colour or color ;-), well Id say Id prefer the more real tone that comes off the Sony from the Loxia. Although I got truer colours from the ZE when used on the Canon. Not really an issue to be fair. Chromatic aberrations the Loxia wins with virtually none. The ZE was a one of the best in its time but it does show a little at the edge/corners in comparison.

To me the clear advantages are the size and the greater DOF at any given aperture the Loxia brings. One of the big advantages of the Sony system is the size and weight of gear you have to carry and in this regard the Loxia adds its part if you love 21mm as much as I do. Also the 52mm will save you some money of you use filters over the ZE's 82mm.

 Heres a couple of files from the back yard for you to compare... Let me know what you think..

Loxia 21mm
ZE 21mm

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Sony A7r Mark II Hands On

Firstly, Thanks to Sony NZ for a hands on with a production model. I had the chance to spend about an hour with the camera today so thought I would blog some very brief thoughts as my time is limited tonight.

Viewfinder – Terrific, much bigger then the previous versions and really enjoyable in use.
Shutter –  MUCH better, really well dampened and silent shutter is precisely that, no sound at all, nada. Yay!
Feel – as you would expect if your a A7II user. Although this camera does feel a little more nuggety due to its more metal construction. I like it.
Focus – is everything its previewed it would be. With native lenses it is swift, broad and (as far as I can tell initially) accurate.
Adapted lenses – Wow! Incredible! Using Canon EF lenses with the Metabones III the focus was just like a native Canon camera. Very fast and torquey. No backwards and forwards like previous models. I also used the Commlite adaptor which wasnt nearly as quick sadly. Still fairly good and highly usable but not in the same league as the Metabones thusfar.
Dynamic Range - Seems as good as the previous A7r. When digging out deep shadows there is a virtual complete absence of noise coming through. Looks to be a further improvement in this area.

From what I have seen so far I would be very excited about this new camera if you are in the market!!

As you may know, I had linked a RAW file in last week but unfortunately unbeknown to me, downloaded imagery is still on embargo. From early August I will upload some new RAWS for your viewing pleasure.. :-)

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Sony FE 28mm F2.0 Musings....

Ive had one of the new FE 28mm lens in my hot little hand for a quick test. Its not the lens Im excitingly waiting for but its nice to see how it performs nonetheless. First impressions are very good! Small, lightweight and sharp. As a raw shooter the only significant 'issue' currently is there is no profile for the distortion which it does suffer a bit from.

Attached is raw file download for you to have a quick look.... Tripod mounted on A7r at F11 with detail in the corners... See what you think....

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Canon EF 11-24mm F4 L Lens Samples

Ive got the hotly awaited 11-24mm in my hot little hands. Wow is it big and solid! Its a beautifully made lens and initial shots show it to be stunning optically... It gives the Nikon 14-24mm a whipping but after this many years you would expect that. And of course its F4 but I'd need a porter if it was 2.8!

Here's a couple of RAW files for you to check out. Harsh midday lighting but just a quick test to see what the edge to edge sharpness is like... Its a free Dropbox account so use links with respect :-)

Monday, December 29, 2014

The Arrogance of Ebay

Time for a rant...

After many years of service I will no longer sell anything on Ebay. The pure and outright price gouging that this company along with its subsidiary of Paypal is doing to its loyal customers is outrageous.

Not only are the fees now over double what they were a year or two ago but they are determined to take a slice of every part of the transaction along the way. Ive just sold something on Ebay and they took @ 10% of the sale (seriously??!) . Now on a reasonably priced item that is just way too big of a dollar value for a listing.

They now also take final fees on your shipping!! WHAT?! I set the actual shipping price on the listing to reflect the accurate shipping cost and they want to tax me on that? I mean your really scraping the bottom of the barrel there.

They then wish to 'hold' my money for 3 weeks even when all appropriate checks have been done with the buyer. I also have well over 100 unique feedbacks with 100% rating.  This is a ploy to gain interest on my money, and then to add insult to this when I transfer my money they give me a rubbish conversion rate!

The irony is they want their EBAY fees paid by the end of the month but they wont give me the sale money to pay them! So for the best part of a month Im having to shell out money...

In a time when there are actually other choices to sell your items I dearly hope others, like myself, leave these thieves behind and move on to these alternatives... forums, buy/sell boards etc. Geez Ive even sold plenty lately in Facebook groups!


Rant over....